Ines Mergel


Interview on Social Networking in Management News

I was interviewed about my social networking class by the Management News of Harvard’s Extension School. The full interview is here: http://www.dce.harvard.edu/pubs/mgt_news/2008/mergel.html


Google Maps added walking directions

In the world of Garmin, TomTom, and everything else GPS, this is a real innovation in my point of view: Google Maps has added walking directions (beta) to their directions by car. I don’t have a car and use public transportation, bike or walk everywhere — and oftentimes tried to figure out how to get to specific places by the means I have available - without thinking about one way directions, etc.  I really think, that this is an innovation - have to love Google for this!

Here is a screenshot of a “test walk” around Harvard Square - it shows the directions without going around all the one way streets around Harvard Square (A+):


Voluntary Engagement in Knowledge Sharing

Our paper titled “Lending a helping hand: Voluntary engagement in knowledge sharing” is available online at InderScience now. Together with my co-authors David Lazer and Maria Christina Binz-Scharf, we analyzed data on DNA Forensic Scientists and their informal knowledge sharing acitivities:

Knowledge is essential for the functioning of every social system, especially for professionals in knowledge-intensive organisations. Since individuals do not possess all the work-related knowledge that they require, they turn to others in search for that knowledge. While prior research has mainly focused on antecedents and consequences of knowledge sharing and understanding why people do not share knowledge, less is known why people provide knowledge, and what conditions trigger voluntary engagement in knowledge sharing. Our article addresses this gap by proposing a multi-level framework for voluntary engagement in knowledge sharing: individual, relational, group, and informational. We provide illustrations from a particular knowledge-intensive community, DNA forensic scientists who work at public laboratories.

Full paper version in pdf is available here.


FirstMonday: Web 2.0; Political mobilization issues


Abandonning email for social network sites

The New York Times Technology section had an interesting article this morning: an IBM engineer explains how he moves all his attention away from traditional email in favor of collecting all the information he needs from social network sites instead.

I heard a similar reason earlier this month during a talk about Intellipedia - when Chris Rasmussen mentioned that information is moved out of the traditional email channel into Wikis and Blogs instead. That way it is accessible to everyone and not limited to a pre-specified group of people.


The New Yorker: Gladwell on the origin of ideas

Malcom Gladwell wrote a nice piece titled “In the air: Who says that big ideas are rare” in The New Yorker.


Random.org

I just discovered the random.org website and thought about potential applications. I liked the idea of flipping a coin and the audience can actually see the result.


A good place…

This seems to be a good place to be in the future: Maxwell School at Syracuse #1 Graduate School of Public Affairs!


Tapping on the wisdom of the crowd: Social network analysis software tools on Wikipedia

(I posted this on the Netgov blog and also on the Socnet list server earlier this weekend).

Together with Jana Diesner, CMU, and Matthias Meyer, WHU, I have started to collect information on social network analysis software packages and libraries.
In order to be able to make a selection from a larger pool of tools, we searched the literature and the Web for archives of tools that are widely accepted. Our goal here was to compile a systematic and (to an extent) exhaustive list of tools along with their main features, application areas and possibilities for interoperability across tools. We failed in this effort.

Clearly, there is a plethora of listings of some of the tools according to more or less explicitly stated categorization or selection criteria out there (e.g. INSNA and the chapter by Huisman and Duijn (2005) on Software for Social Network Analysis).

However, none of these lists seemed complete or up-to-date to us. We noticed that compiling our own list leads to the exact same problems, and we think we are not the only ones who went through this process. We thought this might be a good case for putting the wisdom of crowd idea into action in the social networks community. Our rationale here is that no single Web editor or researcher needs to carry the burden of building and/or maintaining such a collection, but collectively this goal can be achieved with very little individual effort.
Wikipedia has an elaborated site on Social networks (the Social network analysis site is automatically redirected there). We started to expand the network analytic section by adding a table – which was moved by the community within a day to a new page now called Social Network Analysis Software that allows everyone to add a tool along with a URL, short description, unique feature, platform it runs on, and price.

We hereby invite the social network community members to add their tools and/ or to edit/ fill some of the cells in the table. Note, the present structure of the table is a suggestion, and can be modified by anyone. Potentially, this table and the references associated with it might grow -in this case we might move the table to a new page that will be linked from the current page. If you have trouble working with the Wikipedia Table you can also send your information to Jana and we will integrate it into Wikipedia. We are looking forward to the collective results!

Ines Mergel
Jana Diesner
Matthias Meyer


INSNA 2008 - Pictures

I am back from Florida and freezing in Boston - and here are the pictures.