Two open research positions

👀 In my research group, we have either two 50% TVL-13 positions or one 100% TVL-13 position open. The job descriptions are available in English and German.

🎯 We are working on all things agile and digital in the public sector.

🗃 -> 🚀 If you want to contribute to our understanding of how different types of work practices can positively improve the effectiveness of service delivery in public administrations, how the interactions between citizens and civil servants can improve as a result, and by extension make our democratic institutions and bureaucracy more resilient, then this is your place!

👩‍💻 In addition, we collaborate in digital presence, meaning, research group members can work remotely and teaching has commenced in presence after the pandemic.

📑 Applications need to be submitted through our online portal at the University of Konstanz:👉 https://lnkd.in/eYrZgwCN

👉 Public job ad on academics.com: https://www.academics.com/jobs/academic-staff-universitaet-konstanz-konstanz-1086995

⏰ Deadline for applications is June 1, 2024.

Agile and Digital Governance Research Colloquium: New dates for the summer semester 2024

🗣 Our Agile and Digital Governance Research Colloquium plan for the summer semester is available!


👩‍🎓 This seminar series is again co-organized by Greta Nasi (Bocconi University), m. jae moon (Yonsei University), Rainer Kattel (UCL), David Eaves (UCL), and myself (University of Konstanz).


🎯 We will each provide feedback on the papers to move them closer to publication.


👀 We will distribute the calendar entry including the Zoom link a week before each meeting.


🗓 Please note that the dates and times vary this semester to include participants in more time zones. Times are listed as CET.


📩 Feel free to sign up to our email list to receive the alerts: https://lnkd.in/e6Y3eb8h

Call for Papers: Symposium: Unveiling the Dynamics of Digital Transformation in Public Administrations

Guest editors: Mila Gasco, Albert Meijer, Ines Mergel, Jae Moon, Greta Nasi

The adoption of information and communication technologies in public administrations is a topic that has been discussed previously. It goes back at least to the last century (Janowski 2015). Over time, several studies have focused on the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the public sector, focusing on the ICT contribution to service provision and the automation and digitalization of processes, the legitimacy of government, and its capacity to meet their constituents’ needs. More recently, the pandemic and the pace at which emerging technologies are being implemented have fundamentally changed the notion of digital, bringing increasing attention to the profound digital transformation, encompassing both internal administrative processes and external citizen services (Gong, Yang and Shi, 2020; Mergel et al., 2019).

While existing literature often frames this shift as a technological challenge, the practical reality for public managers and civil servants is that it represents a significant institutional, organizational and personnel development endeavor (Cordella and Bonina, 2012). First, this transformative process poses a significant organizational and capacity challenge to reassess administrative practices and routines (Gasco-Hernandez et al., 2022; Mergel et al. 2019). It also prompts inquiries into whether digital transformation truly contributes to value generation. New approaches may be, therefore, needed to better understand this phenomenon. In this respect, agile digital transformation, characterized by using agile methodologies to reshape an organization’s digital capabilities in response to evolving needs and technological advancements, may offer a flexible and iterative perspective (Mergel et al., 2018; Mergel; Ganapati, Whitford, 2019).

Second, user engagement emerges as a pivotal factor in ensuring the success and effectiveness of initiatives. Digital transformation requires adequate engagement and participation to design and implement digital services that meet stakeholders’ expectations, including citizens’, and that show their relevance and responsiveness to real needs (Distel and Lindgren, 2023; Gasco-Hernandez et al., 2022; Ashaye and Irani, 2019). But user engagement goes beyond mere participation; it involves fostering a collaborative approach known as co-production (Bovaird, 2007). Various analyses of digital coproduction have been presented in the literature, but an academic understanding of the relationship between coproduction and digital transformation is lacking (Meijer, 2012; Lember et al., 2019; Meijer & Boon, 2021).

Although existing literature underscores the importance of digital transformation, there still needs to be a gap in understanding the actual processes of digital transformation, including the use of agile approaches (Mergel, 2023, 2016). This symposium aims to explore the intricate dynamics of digital transformation within public administrations, focusing on the organizational, service, performance, and collaboration dimensions. Some of the key questions that the symposium aims to address include the preconditions for successful transformation; how public managers navigate the ambidexterity of simultaneously maintaining traditional administrative routines alongside agile practices, the transferability of results into existing administrative routines and legal contexts frameworks, how digital and agile transformations unfold; how co-production becomes particularly crucial for agile digital transformation, where the iterative and adaptive nature of the process necessitates continuous feedback and input from end-users; and.

The symposium seeks to address these gaps through a combination of theoretical foundations and empirical evidence. Papers may explore the evolving landscape and focus on insights into the challenges, opportunities, and leading practices that define the intersection of digital innovation, agile methodologies, and organizational change in the public sector. 

Call for papers

This symposium seeks to address critical questions, including the necessary internal changes for the successful digital transformation, new modes of interaction with public servants and their clientele, the application of innovative work practices, including service design methodologies to the design of digital public services, the introduction and implementation of agile methods in public administrations, and the organizational, procedural, and technological outcomes of digitally transformed public administrations. The symposium also welcomes exploration of the role of organizational and institutional factors, digital transformation competencies and methods, evolving relationships with stakeholders, public value creation in digital transformation projects, and participation in digital transformation. Through this comprehensive exploration, the symposium aims to shed light on the intricate dynamics of digital transformation in public administrations and pave the way for a more nuanced understanding of these contemporary processes.

The symposium may include topics and research questions such as:

  • How do internal administrative processes and external citizen services undergo digital transformation, and what are the organizational, service, and performance implications?
  • What are the key challenges faced by public managers in maintaining traditional administrative routines alongside agile practices during digital transformation?
  • What are the critical preconditions for achieving successful digital and agile transformation in public administrations?
  • How can outcomes from new organizational routines and structures be effectively transferred into existing administrative routines and legal frameworks during digital transformation?
  • How has the adoption of information and communication technologies evolved in public administrations, considering historical perspectives and recent advancements?
  • What frameworks and methodologies define agile digital transformation in public sector organizations, and how do they contribute to flexibility and adaptability?
  • How do active user engagement and co-production in the digital transformation of public services increase their usability and acceptance?
  • What organizational arrangements facilitate successful digital and agile transformations, and how do these arrangements unfold in practice?
  • How do public managers navigate the ambidexterity of simultaneously maintaining traditional administrative routines and implementing agile practices during digital transformation?

These topics and research questions aim to address critical gaps in understanding the complex dynamics of digital transformation, agile methodologies, and organizational change in the public sector, fostering a comprehensive exploration of theoretical foundations and empirical evidence.

The symposium aims to embrace a broad spectrum of research methodologies and theoretical perspectives that collectively enhance the depth and breadth of knowledge in this evolving domain. It welcomes manuscripts with diverse research strategies and designs, ranging from single case studies to comparative research employing multi-case analysis or panel designs. Both quantitative investigations and qualitative approaches are encouraged as viable methods of inquiry. The symposium also welcomes theoretical contributions that significantly advance the understanding of topics related to the dynamics of digital transformation in the current volatile times. 

Positioning the proposed symposium within the journal Public Administration

The Symposium on “Unveiling the Dynamics of Digital Transformation in Public Administrations” finds an ideal home in the esteemed pages of Public Administration, a journal renowned for its global circulation and comprehensive coverage. In the contemporary landscape, public administrations worldwide are undergoing a profound digital metamorphosis, transcending mere technological challenges to encompass institutional, organizational, and personnel development. Public Administration, with its global reach, is well-positioned to capture and disseminate scholarly contributions that address these multifaceted aspects. This journal stands as a beacon for research that delves into the major administrative challenges posed by the digital era, generating theoretical advances and offering substantive insights. As we navigate the intricate terrain of reshaping administrative practices and routines in the digital age, the symposium aims to attract papers from a diverse, global audience, making Public Administration the natural platform for fostering international dialogue and knowledge exchange.

Public Administration has a well-established history of contributing to the exploration of the intersection between technologies and various topics within the realm of public administration. This encompasses investigations into how technologies shape service delivery, as exemplified by studies such as Foley and Alfonso (2009) and Nasi et al. (2011).

Moreover, the journal has contributed to advancing our understanding of the intricate relationship between technology and fundamental democratic principles, including legitimacy, transparency, and accountability. This is evidenced by research conducted by scholars such as Pina, Torres, and Royo (2007), Fraussen and Halpin (2018), and Margetts and John (2023). Additionally, Public Administration explores the impact of technologies on citizens’ satisfaction, as demonstrated by studies like Prokop and Tepe (2022). Through its rich tradition of scholarly inquiry, the journal continues to contribute valuable insights into the evolving landscape of technology and its multifaceted interactions with public administration. 

This symposium significantly enhances and extends the scholarly contributions of the Public Administration journal by focusing on the dynamics of digital transformation within public administrations. It provides a specialized and in-depth examination of the organizational, service, performance, and collaboration dimensions of digital transformation. By addressing the existing gap in understanding the actual processes of digital and agile transformation, the symposium complements the journal’s existing body of knowledge.

The symposium contributes to Public Administration by investigating key questions surrounding the prerequisites for successful digital transformation, the challenges of maintaining traditional administrative routines alongside agile practices, and the mechanisms for integrating outcomes from new organizational structures into existing administrative frameworks. Through a combination of empirical evidence and theoretical foundations, the symposium aims to provide nuanced insights into the evolving landscape of technology in the public sector.

In essence, the symposium serves as a specialized forum within the broader scope of Public Administration, offering a focused exploration of the intersection of digital innovation, agile methodologies, and organizational change. Doing so enriches the journal’s content with contemporary and relevant discussions, fostering a deeper understanding of the complexities associated with the ongoing digital transformation within public administrations.

Timeline

Deadline for abstract proposals (about 1000 words, excluding references): September 1st, 2024

Feedback from guest editors: September 30th, 2024

Submission of full paper through PA system for peer-review: January 31st, 2025

Subject to the process of peer review, accepted papers will be published online as they are accepted, and the issue is planned to be published in the third quarter of 2026.

Format of contribution

High-quality submissions that offer theoretical and empirical contributions on emerging issues in digital transformation in government, focusing on insights into the challenges, opportunities, and leading practices that define the intersection of digital innovation, agile methodologies, citizens’ engagement, and organizational change in the public sector.

Αbstracts: Abstracts should be no longer than 1000 words, excluding references, and include the scope, methodology, preliminary findings, and contributions the manuscript makes. The deadline for abstract submission is September 1st, 2024. The format of research papers needs to comply with the styles of Public Administration.

Abstract proposals and the first paper draft should be in MS Word format and be submitted to Greta Nasi (greta.nasi@unibocconi.it) by email. Final submission of revised papers should be made directly to the online submission system.

References

Ashaye, O. R., & Irani, Z. (2019). The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services. International Journal of Information Management49, 253-270.

Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public administration review, 67(5), 846-860.

Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly29(4), 512-520.

Distel, B., & Lindgren, I. (2023). A matter of perspective: Conceptualizing the role of citizens in E-government based on value positions. Government Information Quarterly, 101837

Foley, P., & Alfonso, X. (2009). eGovernment and the transformation agenda. Public Administration, 87(2), 371-396.

Fraussen, B., & Halpin, D. (2018). How do interest groups legitimate their policy advocacy? Reconsidering linkage and internal democracy in times of digital disruption. Public administration96(1), 23-35.

Gasco-Hernandez, M., Nasi, G., Cucciniello, M., & Hiedemann, A. (2022). The role of organizational capacity to foster digital transformation in local governments: The case of three European smart cities. Urban Governance, 2(2), 236-246.

Gong, Y., Yang, J., & Shi, X. (2020). Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101487.

Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2023). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 1-25.

Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221-236.

Kettl, D. F. (2015). The transformation of governance: Public administration for the twenty-first century. Jhu Press.

Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tõnurist, P. (2019). The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation. Public Management Review21(11), 1665-1686.

Margetts, H., & John, P. (2023). How rediscovering nodality can improve democratic governance in a digital world. Public Administration.

Meijer, A. (2012). Co-production in an information age: Individual and community engagement supported by new media. Voluntas23, 1156-1172.

Meijer, A., & Boon, W. (2021). Digital platforms for the co-creation of public value. Policy & Politics49(2), 231-248.

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly36(4), 101385.

Mergel, I. (2016). Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly33(3), 516-523.

Mergel, I., Gong, Y., & Bertot, J. (2018). Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 291-298.

Mergel, I., Ganapati, S., & Whitford, A. B. (2021). Agile: A new way of governing. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 161-165.

Nasi, G., Frosini, F., & Cristofoli, D. (2011). Online service provision: are municipalities really innovative? The case of larger municipalities in Italy. Public Administration89(3), 821-839.

Osborne, S. P., Nasi, G., & Powell, M. (2021). Beyond co‐production: Value creation and public services. Public Administration99(4), 641-657.

Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2007). Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local governments? An empirical study. Public Administration85(2), 449-472.

Prokop, C., & Tepe, M. (2022). Talk or type? The effect of digital interfaces on citizens’ satisfaction with standardized public services. Public Administration100(2), 427-443.

New Article Alert: Institutional Work in Smart Cities: Interviews with Smart City Managers

Together with Ali Guenduez and co-authors, we just published a new article on the institutional work that smart city managers conduct. The smart city concept itself is in practice mostly a buzzword and under its umbrella, many different types of transformation efforts are summarized. While we know a lot about the theoretical framework and the projects that are publicly funded, we know relatively little about the actual work that public managers have to do internally to implement smart city initiatives:

From interviews with international smart city managers, we identified three different types of institutional work practices:

1) disruption, especially to increase support for alternative processes, tools, methods, and ways of working, 2) creation to foster innovation, strengthen citizen-centricity, build capacity, encourage the use of technology and data, mobilize resources and support, collaborate and build networks, legitimate smart city development, and 3) maintenance: adhere to existing power structures and rule systems, enable the continuous use of the existing IT infrastructure, and reproduce existing norms and belief systems.

The article is available in open access format at the journal of Urban Governance:

Ali Asker Guenduez, Ines Mergel, Kuno Schedler, Saskia Fuchs, Christopher Douillet,
Institutional Work in Smart Cities: Interviews with Smart City Managers, Urban Governance,
2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2024.01.003.

Social Affordances of Agile Governance

New article alert! I am happy to share my sole-authored article titled “Social Affordances of Agile Governance”. It was published today in the journal Public Administration Review.

In this article, I use insights from civil servants who are asked to implement agile project management practices and combine them with their administrative routines. This is a highly relevant topic in several countries. In the German context even more so: the current coalition agreement states specifically that the German public administrations will become more agile: “The public sector should become more agile and digital. It must focus on interdisciplinary and creative solutions to problems. We will consistently think from a user perspective. We want to overcome silo thinking and will equip permanent cross-departmental and cross-agency agile project teams and innovation units with specific competencies. We will enshrine proactive administrative action in law through application-free and automated procedures.” In addition, over 11,000 municipalities are supposed to implement the agile governance model. Other countries are working on similar public management modernization efforts.

It is therefore important to understand how line-based organizations with bureaucratic work routines can integrate agile work practices. What is necessary is to understand the opportunities that agile provides for different ways of working. I, therefore, use the concept of social affordances which focuses on exactly these perceptions of the positive effects that a new behavior can have on the work environment. Next, I generated focus group data in one city from all involved stakeholders to extract the perceived, hidden, and false affordance to agile governance and theorize how the findings might apply to other public administrations in which a similar phenomenon is represented.

You can download the paper for open access here. Please use it for your own work. The full citation is at the moment: Mergel, Ines (2023): Social Affordances of Agile Governance, in: Public Administration Review, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.13787.

Looking forward to your comments and suggestions!

Agile and Digital Governance Research Colloquium during the winter semester 2023-2024

The Agile and Digital Governance Research Colloquium continues during the winter semester 2023-2024. Feel free to sign up to our mailing list here.

The research colloquium is again co-organized by Greta Nasi (Bocconi University, Italy), Rainer Kattel and David Eaves (UCL, UK), and M Jae Moon (Yonsei University, South Korea). Everyone is welcome to join us!

The first talk is scheduled for October 19th:

My first book sprint experience

📚 This week, I participated in a book sprint for a new co-authored book I am working on with two colleagues from the University of Konstanz. A writing trainer guided us through the process. We adopted the Scrum roles: developers as the editorial/author team, a project manager as the Scrum master who timeboxed us.

📑 The sprint started with a meeting to agree on how we wanted to work together as a team. We then worked on the manuscript during the writing times, editorial meetings, work meetings, and reviews of what we accomplished and what we needed to do next. In each phase, we adopted specific roles and tasks.

🤼‍♂️ At the end of each day, we conducted a retrospective about our individual and team progress.

💥 The big accomplishment: at the end of the (short) 2-day book sprint, we submitted the exposé of our book idea to the publisher.

Digital Governance Lab on Instagram

My research group, the “Digital Governance Lab” at the University of Konstanz has an Instagram page now. We are posting about our research group members, the newest presentations and publications, as well as about some of the agile teaching innovations.

Follow along here:

What is digital transformation actually changing in public administrations?

We set out to understand how the newest wave of the implementation and use of technologies in public administrations is actually digitally transforming their processes. Our expectation was that there must be transformative change that is happening and that we can trace this is in the existing research published in academic journals.

For that purpose, we analyzed the empirical evidence and included a total of 164 articles. Our aim was to trace the type of change that is digitally induced in public administrations. However, the surprising finding is that 2/3 can only be labeled as incremental change and only 1/3 can potentially be labeled as transformative change.

Based on this analytical exercise, we developed a theoretical framework that shows how digital transformation can be studied in public administrations.

The results were published last month in Public Management Review (open access):

Reference:

Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2023). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 1-25.